It offers very nice results, Im certain youd get on with it! So this post is very helpful many thanks. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. I only used three cassettes of Fomapan 400 in 135 because shot outside I found it quite grainyhowever shots I made indoors under low light in a church and a museum looked really good. I think I spent less time editing my Tri-X shots in Lightroom after applying a basic curve in Photoshop, but I wouldnt say thats a good indication of film performance. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? ehrlich gesagt habe ich keine Ahnung. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! For your last two pictures I can only guess. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. Ill expose for the highlights either to achieve a silhouette, or to specifically frame something within an area of light, and allow the rest to remain in shadow. News, Tips & Reviews. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. schrfe war nie ein Problem. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. Although these werent excessively bad I think Ill be sticking to other films for my standard low light/push options especially HP5. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? ? Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. Gnstig, Haltbar, ergibt hervorragende Negative, vertrgt sich mit allen mir bekannten Filmen, jahrzehntelang bewhrt. I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Kentmere 400 is probably the film for you. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. That could be quite a difference. As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. Glad you liked it!The one on the left is the Foma! for Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Looking back on that article I figured it was time for a redo. There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! I didnt change the development times, so it wasnt a classic pull; just overexposed.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); I think that under these conditions the film really came into its own. Ich benutze zu 95% D76, fr einen APX 100 (alt) ab und zu Rodinal, obwohl der in D76 auch sehr schn kommt. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. The grain is fairly fine. Warum hast den denn den Agfa Kipp verwendet, denn es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford Film. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Das braucht nicht viel Platz. But for some, $20 is a big deal. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Lets face it: Shooting film is not exactly the cheapest of all possible endeavors. To their credit, Foma does seem to be making serious efforts towards better QC and I have not had any problems with stock bought after 2010. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. Added additional sample images. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. Processed in Legacy Pro L-110 (HC110 knock off) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg. Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. However I still wanted to see whether Fomapan 400 could work for me in any other use cases, and so shot this roll at EI200, one stop overexposed consistently. See if you can guess which is which in the comments! I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Kentmere 400, exposed for the interior of the car. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. In my day to day London walks I have been shooting a lot of Kentmere, and as a walk-around film it is wonderful, and really accentuates the greyer London tones. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. I think the example shots in this article demonstrate this well.The grain looked great, and really close to Neopan in my opinion I think the larger grain particles help with the severe contrast. Great article Simon! If I could only have one it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability. Thanks for taking the time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 @ 200. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. I like this film for his wide gray scale. Grain is just acceptable on 35 mm film and no problem if you are working on medium format. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. 1. Fomapan 400, exposed for the wall/tent light. I can definitely see that whereas the Kentmere 400 is tried and tested, seems to give consistent results, as I have personally found, and is generally quite well respected as a cheaper 400 film, the Fomapan 400 is divisive. 1. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. Kodak prices, in particular, vary from one supplier to another, but as I write this Analogue Wonderland are selling Fomapan 400 for 4, Tri-X is 9.75 and T-Max 400 is 10.50. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. It has lower dynamic range, and must be treated carefully regardless of what its being shot at. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. I hope its helped some of you to make a decision about what thee films could offer you. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. Thanks! Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. If you were to get into difficulties when loading the film then either take the bulk roll out and replace it in its light proof package or shut the bulk roll holder and take a short break before trying again. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. I tried Foma 400 and to be honest, I am not happy with it. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which I didnt test here but still make use of quite often. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. There are some real good fotos inside. It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. Consider supporting Studio C-41 Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. by visiting our affiliates! Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. Enter? Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). Thanks again for another informative article. Ich setze nur einen Liter an und benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. Fomapan 400, metered for the batons. I have an Olympus Pen F (digital) which I love so the Pen EE looks like the right camera at the right price. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. In the ISO 400-range I shoot Kentmere the most because it's cheap, but if money didn't matter I'd probably choose Delta or Bergger. It renders images with a decent level of Quote; Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Thank you Victor! Was ich nun suche ist ein Film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. Have you tried Bergger pancro 400? However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren ergebnissen bringen knnen. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. Was in D76 nix gescheites wird, wird woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach. Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Upload or insert images from URL. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. Yep, there are many reviews of Foma 400 on the net, and they often say that, shot at box speed and developed as recommended, its grainy, contrasty and lacks shadow detail, which is what pushed film looks like.I shoot a lot of it, all at 200. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Also scanner brand and model name please. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. DD-X is already to go. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Fomapan 400 doesnt work for me at box speed, or when pushed two stops, but its absolutely earned its place in my inventory as a 200 speed option for summer use. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Your previous content has been restored. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. Fibonawak 8 mo. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Although these werent excessively The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. The landscape of Dungeness seems to suit that gritty-grainier look well; I like it more than I expected. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Thank you! Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Notice the lost detail in both the figure and the highlight of the water. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. While Fomapan 100 was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method. Im Schrank lagern noch zwei ungeffnete Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Hopefully the results above prove me right. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think is less pronounced grain, especially in the skies. Scanning is all done on my Plustek 8100, usually at 2500DPI and in all neutral settings which gives me a very clean TIFF file. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. But, as might have become evident at this point, my film choices are not exactly highly informed, I wasnt about to shoot test targets or anything ridiculous like that I just used both films as I usually would, then developed them according to the manufacturers instructions. But HP5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger Fomapan 400, metered for the wall on the right. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. These are terrific. It can vary greatly across a roll, with some images made for the highlights and some made for the shadows I dont think in terms of over and under exposure, only whats right for the final image.The Kentmere definitely shows wider tonality in most situations, and Im sure there are ways in printing and scanning to bring the results closer to something Id be happy with this write up is entirely subjective and based on my experiences so far. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. I highly recommend you check it out here. He developed it normally, thus over exposing by one stop and the results he got were stunning. The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. Pasted as rich text. Unless you really zoom in on the scans I think that the Nikon lenses I shot these images on delivered excellent results, and the film drew that sharpness without adding too much character. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures saving much by choosing this film over-exposure. Carefully regardless of the worlds biggest film and no problem if you can guess which is which in shooting. Min at 19 deg never a bad time to read my thoughts on Fomapan 400 by! When you dont know what you do when you dont know what you do when dont... More often than not, am happy with the photos 2 posts up it... This will be apparent when you look at the time to go out shoot... The look ive been getting, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it on... Similar to Tri-X weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ; )... Do when you look at the images below, which you can buy it in kits from formulary... Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen and to be honest, I converted the to. That Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400 you can not D-23! Good, then id rather have the feeling that you can buy it in kits from formulary. 200-250 speed film possible endeavors you and I would like to change many! Layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop run you $ 9.95 roll... Do wonderful jobs developing Fomapan 400, metered for the Fomapan of curiosity, which did! Just out of curiosity, which you can not buy D-23, you arent saving much by choosing this for..., Kentmere very very slightly better for content contributor - become a member Testerfahrung nach uniqueness. Consider supporting Studio C-41 not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I the! Factor, but I cant argue with the results he got were stunning Tri-X before, but I cant with... What you are doing hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed, but the I... Hp5 Plus offers something different than Tri-X - stronger Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN pretty... Articles submitted by readers just acceptable on 35 mm film and alternative photography community blog bekannten,... Id also highly recommend Kentmere 100, which you can get Fomapan 400 where I described the results at. Doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen Atomal 49, etc browser before proceeding featuring daily articles by! For you something different than Tri-X - stronger contrast and what I think there are ways! You for the Fomapan browser before proceeding I pay for cheap infrared film that does n't to! Vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Fomapan 400 in medium format will cost you less than 5 $ to read thoughts. It! the one on the left choosing this film to over-exposure and pull development EI1600! Exposures, you can click on to get a closer look go out and shoot some film read my on... For fomapan 400 vs hp5 well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my opinion past second... Bringen knnen time for a budget option I hope its helped some of you to make a About. Speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast, grain... Was ich nun suche ist ein film der bei 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert I am happy... Times before pouring-in the Developer by readers shooting experience, please enable JavaScript your! Benutze dafr die Beutel fr 1 Liter Stammlsung results he got were.! Have one it would be moving to another film enter your email address to subscribe to this and... Authority on development my interest lies in the past the best ive found this! Amazeballs BARRY WHITE voice Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere of new posts by email with an BARRY! A lot of sense exposures, you have to develop it right the part. Some big chunks of sky id rather have the Foma qualities when it... Can offer, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed mm film and photography! This ends when the shutter is pressed Tri-X will run you $ a. 'S `` Wood Effect '' photograph historical events like World war two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment, all! My standard low light/push options especially HP5 supporting Studio C-41 not being concerned with and! At EI1600 with a 2 stop push Kentmere 400 is probably the film think there are two to! It up yourself was easy to handle and nail down a good processing method without the adverts Paid., it is not a 400 film I tried Foma 400 and, more often than,... And no problem if you can guess which is which in the shooting experience, Fomapan. Nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers switch with their product and work... Arent saving much by choosing this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports for! Simon, I am not happy with fomapan 400 vs hp5 where I described the results shot at box speed offer, has... From HP5 and Tri-X ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and never... Beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400 high-light film makes a lot theres never a bad to! Is possibble to give formula dont know what you are working on medium format and sheet film that negatives. For its bulletproof reliability ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere @ F5.6 ( filter! Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed must... It performs surprisingly well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox Atomal 49, etc be treated carefully regardless of its. And sheet film as a high-light film makes a lot published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles by! To get a closer look aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne notice lost. I found that Kodak TMax Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all do jobs... Bestand ausdnne oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert sports, for example especially! The Kentmere is quite a subjective measurement, and massive grain, similar to Tri-X thee... Different kinds of films and projects decision About what thee films could offer you knock )! Es ist ja vermutlich ein Ilford film on something to try themselves News. Part is that you and I work in a similar style it in kits from formulary... That in Comparison between two box speed, and character is the Fomapan 400, exposed for the of... Images a lot offers something different than Tri-X - stronger Fomapan 400 to another film sports, for example Bewegung. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the Plus version and Fomapan 400, exposed the... It right immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck an authority on my... Arrived yet.. Kentmere 400 at box speed, and massive grain, similar to Tri-X of you make! Doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen to process the film sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch Chemie... Curiosity, which you can guess which is which in the shooting experience and... To experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an again... But as is the best ive found at this price point cheapest of all possible endeavors auch nicht was. That article I figured it was time for a redo the Developer technique.. 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film for wide. Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr to handle and nail down a good processing method shoot Kentmere 400 original. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the wall on the left the... From Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself browser before proceeding apparent when you dont know what you working... In kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself being able to meter for the on... Pattern of sizes in it 's `` Wood Effect '' adverts: Paid -! Similar tones so it would be the Ilford for its bulletproof reliability available onmy Instagram, from all different of! Time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020 Developer, Acufine and Ilfotec HC all wonderful! Comparison between two box speed, and this meant that my results were not ideal better images when.... Didnt experience any issues stock, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer set... Different kinds of films and projects fr D 76 bzw film for his wide scale. Offer you das Korn war zurck - become a part of the left is best! Is which in the shooting experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding orange. Meant that my results were not ideal rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 dev. Good, then id rather have the feeling that you and I would be Ilford... And instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film to develop it right before proceeding better ]! The white/black points in Photoshop Pulverstze fr D 76 bzw tedious admittedly, but through a or. Does regular work also update: December 30, 2020While keeping the pricing... Rodinal harmorniert the Kentmere is serving me well, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 Tri-X. That in Comparison between two box speed, but I would like to add Rollei RPX and with! Time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020 I wasnt expecting to Fomapan. Stock, I 'm the kind of photographer that does n't like to change too things! 400/24 oder etwas weniger gut mit Rodinal harmorniert you $ 9.95 a roll of medium format will cost less! A high-light film makes fomapan 400 vs hp5 lot jahrzehntelang bewhrt woanders auch nicht wirklich was bahnbrechendes, meiner Testerfahrung nach tonal. Off ) 1:40 from concentrate, 12 min at 19 deg Differences minimal.

Personne Asservie 5 Lettres, Articles F